(x)
“Don’t put your trust in revolutions. They always come around again. That’s why they’re called revolutions. People die, and nothing changes.”
- Terry Pratchett, “Night Watch”
(via cosmictuesdays)
(x)
“Don’t put your trust in revolutions. They always come around again. That’s why they’re called revolutions. People die, and nothing changes.”
- Terry Pratchett, “Night Watch”
(via cosmictuesdays)
i cant dismantle the patriarchy. target has no weapons equipped
(Source: angelicbulwark, via baenling)
One of the most ridiculous concepts that society promotes is that we should always consider “the other side”, that we should always compromise, that the truth is always “in the middle. The problem with this is that it ignores how many stances and opinions are completely not compatible with each other.
Feminism, anti-racism, and other similar issues are not a friendly debate. They are a struggle that’s life and death for millions (or, realistically, billions) of people. They are struggles whose only eventual outcome is the eradication of what they fight against (patriarchy, white supremacy, etc). There is no compromise, there is no “truth in the middle”, and there’s certainly no “agree to disagree” about it. Either patriarchy is abolished completely or it isn’t at all; either white supremacy becomes a ridiculous relic of the past as it should be or people of color continue to suffer or be murdered in its name.
These movements can’t “consider the other side” because the other side is actively trying to eradicate them and dehumanize their participants. To agree to be dehumanized under new conditions is not acceptable. MRAs and “equalists” often wonder why feminists won’t debate them, but it’s because they don’t understand that they’re the enemy, not a like-minded person with a different approach.
(via jebiwonkenobi)
exclusive call of duty: ghosts screenshot
(Source: writing2eddy, via drinkmasturbatecry)
The Hunter. (2013)
No reel attached to the bow or the arrow, you’ll never be able to retrieve any fish you shoot. You’re not even TRYING now, naked archers. C’mon!
You know I don’t really consider taking lighthearted fun female characters and giving them “realistic” tragic angsty pasts “a victory for women in the media”.
Like, if someone was like “hey Psychonauts 2 is coming out but it’s gonna be super realistic and desaturated and it’s all about Raz’s brand new tragic backstory where he escapes a WWII Nazi concentration camp for Romani people and you get to see him die hyperviolent realistic deaths a lot” I wouldn’t think to myself “hm, yes, very tasteful and mature. What an improvement on the original, we’ve come so far”
I’d probably think “Why didn’t you just make a whole new thing and not call it Psychonauts”
Please state the nature of the temporal emergency.
This is way too awesome to not reblog and share :D
I think I was at that con!!!
Two worlds collided. And they will never tear us apart.
(via cosmictuesdays)
All my favourite science fiction stories end with the prominently-featured space-faring vessel being destroyed.
Star Trek TNG? Warp core breach; aft section explodes, saucer section crashes. (Nevermind all the times the Enterprise blew up in alternate universes, time loops & people’s nightmares.)
Babylon 5? Controlled detonation.
Battlestar Galactica? Deliberately piloted into the sun.
…
This doesn’t bode well for the Lost Light, does it?
NO IT DOES NOT.